Lauren on Living

A Lifestyle Blog about Simplifying Healthy Living

  • Home
  • Health
  • My life
  • Recipes
  • Hire Me

Breastfeeding // State Laws on Public Nursing

August 6, 2013 by lauren.anvari@gmail.com Leave a Comment

us map

I recently read this article, which subsequently inspired me to put together this map.  Some people feel that there are right ways and wrong ways to breastfeed in public and that some of those ways are immodest.  I don’t agree.  Nothing about breastfeeding is immodest.  Luckily, I have never been asked to cover up, move or discontinue while breastfeeding in public, but if it does ever happen I will stand up for my right to feed my child.  It is important to know the laws regarding breastfeeding, because when we are armed with knowledge it makes it easier to bring about change.  So in honor of National Breastfeeding Month I made this map, which gives you the state laws on public breastfeeding at a glance.  For the full laws in each state see below.  I recommend reading the laws of your state carefully because there are some subtle differences in terminology that can make a big difference.  For example Virginia’s law states that a woman may breastfeed in any public place owned by the state, while Florida’s states that you can breastfeed in any public or private place.

Federal law:

Pub. L. No. 106-058, § 647: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a woman may breastfeed her child at any location in a Federal building or on Federal property, if the woman and her child are otherwise authorized to be present at the location.

State Laws:

Alabama

Ala. Code § 22-1-13 (2006): A mother may breastfeed her child in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be present.

Alaska

Alaska Stat. § 29.25.080: A municipality may not enact an ordinance that prohibits or restricts a woman breast-feeding a child in a public or private location where the woman and child are otherwise authorized to be.

Arizona

Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann § 41-1443 (2006): A mother is entitled to breast-feed in any area of a public place or a place of public accommodation where the mother is otherwise lawfully present.

Arkansas

Ark. Stat. Ann. § 20-27-2001 (2007): A woman may breastfeed a child in a public place or any place where other individuals are present.

California

Cal. Civil Code § 43.3 (1997): Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a mother may breastfeed her child in any location, public or private, except the private home or residence of another, where the mother and the child are otherwise authorized to be present.

Colorado

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-6-302 (2004): A mother may breastfeed in any place she has a right to be.

Connecticut

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-64: It shall be a discriminatory practice in violation of this section . . . for a place of public accommodation, resort or amusement to restrict or limit the right of a mother to breast-feed her child; and § 53-34b: No person may restrict or limit the right of a mother to breast-feed her child.

Delaware

Del. Code Ann. tit. 31 § 310 (1997): Notwithstanding any provisions of law to the contrary, a mother shall be entitled to breast-feed her child in any location of a place of public accommodation wherein the mother is otherwise permitted.

District of Columbia

D.C. Code Ann. § 2-1402.82(c)(1): A woman shall have the right to breastfeed her child in any location, public or private, where she has the right to be with her child, without respect to whether the mother’s breast or any part of it is uncovered during or incidental to the breastfeeding of her child.

Florida

Fla. Stat. § 383.015(1) (1993):  A mother may breastfeed her baby in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother’s breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breastfeeding.

Georgia

Ga. Code § 31-1-9 (1999): [A] mother may breast-feed her baby in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother’s breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breast-feeding.

Hawaii

Hawaii Rev. Stat. § 489.21: It is a discriminatory practice to deny, or attempt to deny, the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of a place of public accommodations to a woman because she is breastfeeding a child.

Idaho

No state law protecting the right to breastfeed in public. The only law with regards to breastfeeding has to do with jury exemption.  

Illinois

Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 740 § 137 (2004): A mother may breastfeed her baby in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother’s breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breastfeeding; however a mother considering whether to breastfeed her baby in a place of worship shall comport her behavior with the norms appropriate in that place of worship.

Indiana
Ind. Code § 16-35-6: Notwithstanding any other law, a woman may breastfeed her child anywhere the woman has a right to be.
Iowa

Iowa Code § 135.30A (2002): Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a woman may breast-feed the woman’s own child in any public place where the woman’s presence is otherwise authorized.

Kansas

Kan. Stat. Ann.  § 65-1,248(b): A mother may breastfeed in any place she has a right to be.

Kentucky

Ky. Rev. Stat. § 211-755(1) (2006): Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, a mother may breast-feed her baby or express breast milk in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be.

Louisiana

La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 51. 2247.1(B) (2001): Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a mother may breastfeed her baby in any place of public accommodation, resort, or amusement.

Maine

Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 5, § 4634 (2001): Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a mother may breast-feed her baby in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be.

Maryland

Md. Health-General Code Ann. § 20-801 (2003): (a) A mother may breast-feed her child in any public or private location in which the mother and child are authorized to be. (b) A person may not restrict or limit the right of a mother to breast-feed her child.

Massachusetts

Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 111 § 221(a) (2008): A mother may breastfeed her child in any public place or establishment or place which is open to and accepts or solicits the patronage of the general public and where the mother and her child may otherwise lawfully be present.

Michigan

Mich. Comp. Laws § 41.181, § 67.1aa & § 117.4i et seq. (1994): Public nudity does not include any of the following:

(a) A woman’s breastfeeding of a baby whether or not the nipple or areola is exposed during or incidental to the feeding.

Minnesota

Minn. Stat. §145.905: A mother may breast-feed in any location, public or private, where the mother and child are otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother’s breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breast-feeding.

Mississippi

Miss. Code Ann. § 17-25-7 (2006): A mother may breast-feed her child in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be, without respect to whether the mother’s breast or any part of it is covered during or incidental to the breast-feeding.

Missouri

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 191.918 (1999): Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, a mother may, with as much discretion as possible, breast-feed her child in any public or private location where the mother is otherwise authorized to be.

Montana

Mont. Code Ann. § 50-19-501 (2002): Provides that the breastfeeding of a child in any location, public or private, cannot be considered a nuisance, indecent exposure, sexual conduct, or obscenity.

Nebraska

2011 Neb. Laws, L.B. 197: A mother may breastfeed her child in any public or private location where the mother is otherwise authorized to be.
Nevada
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 201.232(2) (1995): Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a mother may breast feed her child in any public or private location where the mother is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother’s breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breast feeding.

New Hampshire

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 132:10-d (1999): Breast-feeding a child does not constitute an act of indecent exposure and to restrict or limit the right of a mother to breast-feed her child is discriminatory.

New Jersey

N.J. Rev. Stat. § 26:4B-4/5 (1997): Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, a mother shall be entitled to breast feed her baby in any location of a place of public accommodation, resort or amusement wherein the mother is otherwise permitted.

New Mexico

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 28-20-1 (1999): A mother may breastfeed her child in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be present.

New York

N.Y. Civil Rights Law § 79-e (1994): Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a mother may breast feed  her  baby  in  any  location, public or  private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether  or  not  the nipple of the mother’s breast is covered during or incidental to the breast feeding.

North Carolina

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-190.9 (1993): Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a woman may breast feed in any public or private location where she is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother’s breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breast feeding.

North Dakota

N.D. Cent. Code § 23-12-16: If the woman acts in a discreet and modest manner, a woman may breastfeed her child in any location, public or private, where the woman and child are otherwise authorized to be.

Ohio

Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 3781.55 (2005): A mother is entitled to breast-feed her baby in any location of a place of public accommodation wherein the mother otherwise is permitted.

Oklahoma

Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-234 (2004): The Legislature hereby declares that breast-feeding a baby constitutes a basic act of nurturing to which every baby has a right and which should be encouraged in the interests of maternal and child health. In furtherance of this right, a mother may breast-feed her baby in any location where the mother is otherwise authorized to be

Oregon

Or. Rev. Stat. § 109.001 (1999): A woman may breast-feed her child in a public place.

Pennsylvania

P.L. 90, No. 28, Cl. 35 (enacted July 8, 2007): The Freedom to Breastfeed Act permits a mother to nurse her child in public; and provides that breastfeeding may not be considered a nuisance, indecent exposure, sexual conduct or obscenity.

Rhode Island
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-13.5-1 (2008): A woman may feed her child by bottle or breast in any place open to the public.

South Carolina

S.C. Code Ann. § 63-5-40(A)(B) (2008): A woman may breastfeed her child in any location where the mother and her child are authorized to be. Breastfeeding a child in a location where the mother is authorized to be is not considered indecent exposure.

South Dakota

S.D. Codified Laws Ann. § 22-22-24.1 and § 22-24A-2 (2002): South Dakota law exempts breastfeeding from public indecency laws. “Nudity”…this term does not include a mother’s breast-feeding of her baby irrespective of whether or not the nipple is covered during or incidental to feeding.

Tennessee

Tenn. Code Ann. § 68-58-101 and 102 (2006):  A mother may breastfeed in any public or private place she is authorized to be. Breastfeeding shall not be considered public indecency or nudity, obscene, or sexual conduct.

Texas

Tex. Health Code Ann. § 165.002 (1995): A mother is entitled to breast-feed her baby in any location in which the mother is authorized to be.

Utah

Utah Code Ann. § 17-15-25 (1995): The county legislative body may not prohibit a woman’s breast feeding in any location where she otherwise may rightfully be, irrespective of whether the breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breast feeding.

Vermont

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 9, § 4502 (j) (2002): Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a mother may breastfeed her child in any place of public accommodation in which the mother and child would otherwise have a legal right to be.

Virginia

Va. Code § 2.2-1147.1 (2002): Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a woman may breast-feed her child at any location where that woman would otherwise be allowed on property that is owned, leased or controlled by the Commonwealth as defined in § 2.2-1147.

Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 49.60.30(g): [It is] the right of a mother to breastfeed her child in any place of public resort, accommodation, assemblage, or amusement.

West Virginia

No state law protecting the right to breastfeed in public but if this bill gets passed that could change. 

Wisconsin

Wis. Stat. § 253.16: A mother may breast−feed her child in any public or private location where the mother and child are otherwise authorized to be. In such a location, no person may prohibit a mother from breast−feeding her child, direct a mother to move to a different location to breast−feed her child, direct a mother to cover her child or breast while breast−feeding, or otherwise restrict a mother from breast−feeding her child as provided in this section.

Wyoming

Wyo. Stat. § 6-4-201 (2007): Wyoming law exempts breastfeeding from public indecency laws. The act of breastfeeding an infant child, including breastfeeding in any place where the woman may legally be, does not constitute public indecency

Resources:

NCSL Breastfeeding Laws

Nursing Freedom Breastfeeding Laws

Breastfeeding Law – know your rights – a great resource for all laws pertaining to breastfeeding, not just the ones to do with public nursing.

Filed Under: Breastfeeding Tagged With: baby, breastfeeding, federal breastfeeding law, infant, law, maternal and child health, mother, national breastfeeding month, nursing, public, public breastfeeding, public breastfeeding law, state laws, world breastfeeding week

Natural Birth & The Great Intervention Epidemic

April 29, 2013 by lauren.anvari@gmail.com Leave a Comment

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that my mother had three natural, unmedicated births but I have always known that natural birth was something I wanted to do.  Fast forward to Graduate school, where I learnt all the startling statistics about the gross over use of birth interventions in this country, which factor into the alarmingly high cesarean section rate and I became an ardent natural birth advocate.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard things like: “I will for sure be getting an epidural” or “I want a c-section because I don’t want to be all stretched out down there” or “I want to get induced so I can plan when the baby will arrive.”  And the list goes on and on.  The truth is, there is a lack of proper education about childbirth.  Many young women have no real idea about what to expect and most of their knowledge comes from the media, which portrays birth as a harrowing experience.  Couple this naivete with the current treatment of pregnancy and birth by much of the medical field as an illness or disability and we have ourselves an intervention epidemic.

I found it so aggravating when people would ask me if I was planning on having an epidural and they responded with shock when I told them that I was planning on a natural birth. I mean, really people?!  Childbirth is a totally natural process and the female body was designed to carry out this function perfectly.  Granted there are times when interventions are 100% necessary and life saving but for the vast majority of births this is simply not the case.  In fact for the majority of births added interventions can actually be a hindrance and can have a snow ball effect.

The World Health Organization recommended that the upper limit for the cesarean section rate was 15%, while the optimal rate should be 5%.  In the United States the most recent data show that the c-section rate is a staggering 32.8%, meaning that 1 in 3 women deliver by cesarean section.  The Healthy People 2020 goal is to reduce the number of cesareans among low risk women with no prior cesarean births by 10% and yet in some hospitals throughout the country the c-section rate is as high as 50%.  Furthermore there is no evidence to show that having a c-section rate that is higher than 15% does anything to reduce maternal and/or infant mortality or morbidity, in fact just the opposite may be true.  An increased rate of interventions often leads to highers levels of death and disease among mothers and babies.

So what’s going on here?  Well there isn’t a simple answer since there are a lot of factors at play.  Birth weight plays a large roll, the fact is that we are having bigger babies than ever and it’s becoming increasingly more difficult for our bodies to deliver them naturally.  This is why it’s so important to eat right and exercise during pregnancy.  In fact eating right and exercising are vitally important before and after pregnancy as well, but that’s a topic for another day.  Another large factor is the elective and rampant use of interventions during childbirth and I believe this stems in large part from a lack of adequate education about the topic.

The most common major interventions used other than a cesarean section itself are pitocin (used to induce or augment labor) and epidurals. The use of epidurals have become the norm and natural birth is something that is viewed as extreme.  When I told people I wanted to have a natural birth, I was told ‘you don’t have to be a hero’ and asked ‘why would you do that to yourself’.  Child birth is a natural process not an illness or disease and treating it as such can impair the body’s ability to do what it does best.

I said before that interventions can be a slippery slope and here is what I meant.  Epidurals can weaken the contractions that your body has naturally, which then requires you to go on pitocin to strengthen the contractions, but now your contractions are stronger and longer than they should be so you get a stronger epidural to manage the pain, which in turn requires more pitocin, which finally sends the baby into distress (due to the stronger and longer contractions) and you are wheeled off the the OR for a cesarean section.  The same cycle can also be true when labor is induced.  While all this is true it must still be noted that many women do receive epidurals and/or pitocin without needing further intervention.

You have to remember that pitocin and epidurals are serious drugs and whatever you’re receiving your baby is receiving.  Of course these interventions are wonderful and life saving when they’re necessary but they are performed far more than what is medically necessary.  Too many people opt to schedule a c-section or elect to have interventions without really educating themselves about the process.  A cesarean section is MAJOR abdominal surgery, which involves slicing through 6 layers of skin, tissue and muscle and then sewing the individual layers back up again.  Recovery is no picnic especially considering you can’t just relax but instead you have to care for a newborn and be up all hours of the night.  The International Cesarean Awareness Network is a great place to go to learn more.

The last contributing factor I’ll discuss here and perhaps the biggest are policy instruments acting at the health system level. OB-GYNs are faced with more lawsuits than nearly every other medical specialty.  This is because sadly and unfairly if something goes tragically wrong during labor blame is often placed on the medical staff present.  So in order to reduce liability systems are in place to push for more interventions because it is wrongly believed that more interventions means better care.  In order to change this we must change policy, which starts with education.

My intention here is not to demonize birth interventions and I don’t presume to tell women how they should have their babies or ostracize women who opt for birth interventions but I do think it is important to educate yourselves about child birth.  I highly recommend taking a birth class as well as watching The Business of Being Born.  You can also go to The Beauty of Being Born to read real women’s birth stories and share in their experiences.  Also you may want to consider opting to deliver with a midwife that practices out of a hospital or birth center.

If you read Asher’s birth story then you know that I did in fact require the use of interventions.  They were all medically necessary with the exception of one: breaking my water.  This was the first intervention that I  received and I believe that making this choice is what lead to the complications that required me to need further interventions, but that’s just a theory, since there is no way to know for sure.

At the end of the day when it comes to labor and delivery the most important thing is to have a healthy mother and baby, no matter how you get there, I just believe that in the vast majority of cases the best way to ensure that is to have a natural childbirth.

Asher and Raf, 2 hours old

Filed Under: Health Tagged With: Beauty of Being Born, birth, Business of Being Born, c-section, CDC, cesarean, cesarean section, child birth, child health, education, epidural, health, intervention, labor, labor and delivery, maternal and child health, maternal health, morbidity, mortality, Natural birth, pitocin, policy, Public Health, The International Cesarean Awareness Network, WHO, World Health Organization

about

follow/contact

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

categories

Copyright © 2025 · Foodie Pro Theme by Shay Bocks · Built on the Genesis Framework · Powered by WordPress